Hypotheses, a regular column by Jim Holt

More Hypotheses
Lingua Franca Home
Current LF Issue

Book Review
Breakthrough Books:
Experts' book picks
LF Books
The Real Guide


Book Review Archive
LF Archive

SUBSCRIBE

Hirings & Tenurings:
Academic career-watch
Conferences/ Jobs
A listing of what's out there
About Us/Services
Advertising
Site Map
Jobs at Lingua Franca
University Business

Lingua Franca
22 West 38th Street
New York, NY 10018
web@linguafranca.com
Phone: 212 302 0336
Fax: 212 302 0847
Save up to 40%
BARNES&NOBLE
Search by:
Visit our sister site:


A web-only supplement to the April 2000 issue

The Monty Hall Problem, Explained


Are you stumped by the Monty Hall problem? In "Confidence Games," Jim Holt's "Hypotheses" column in the April 2000 issue of Lingua Franca (now on the newsstands!) he describes the famous probability puzzle and its solution:

"There are three doors on stage, labeled A, B, and C. Behind one of them is a sports car; behind the other two are goats. You get to choose one of the doors and keep whatever is behind it. Let's suppose that you choose door A. Now, instead of showing you what's behind door A, Monty Hall slyly opens door B and reveals... a goat. He then offers you the option of switching to door C. Should you take it? (Assume, for the sake of argument, that you are indifferent to the charm of goats.)

"Counterintuitively enough, the answer is that you should switch, since a switch increases your chance of winning from one-third to two-thirds. Why? When you initially chose door A, there was a one-third chance you would win the car. Monty's crafty revelation that there's a goat behind door B gives no new information about what's behind the door you already chose -- you already know one of the other two doors has to conceal a goat -- so the likelihood that the car is behind door A remains one-third. Which means that, with door B eliminated, there is a two-thirds chance that the car is behind door C."

Still not convinced? Perhaps it will help if you look at the game from Monty's perspective. For him, the game is very simple. No matter what door the contestant picks initially, his job is to reveal a goat and ask the contestant if she wants to switch.

Consider what happens when the contestant initially selects the door with the car. Monty has two doors to work with, both of which conceal goats, so he reveals one of the goats, and the door he leaves closed conceals the other goat. That should make sense: If you pick correctly with your initial door, which happens one-third of the time, switching to the other closed door ensures you'll wind up with a goat.

Now, consider what happens when the contestant picks incorrectly, and selects a door concealing a goat. Monty now has two doors to work with, only one of which conceals a goat, so he must open that door. The door he leaves closed therefore must conceal the car.

This is a key realization. If the contestant picks incorrectly, which occurs two-thirds of the time, the door Monty leaves has to conceal the car. So it makes good sense for the contestant to switch doors, for two-thirds of the time doing so will win her the car.

James Ryerson is Associate Editor of Lingua Franca and Managing Editor of Arts & Letters Daily.

Home| Current Issue| Breakthrough Books| Hirings & Tenurings| Letters
Book Review| LF Books| Archive| Conferences| Advertising| Subscribe
About Us| Jobs| Site Map| Company Information

Copyright © 2000 Lingua Franca, Inc. All rights reserved.